I'm currently reading the autobiography of Lady Hyegyong, a Crown Princess in 18th century Korea. It's written in four parts, and addressed to her nephew (1st memoir) and grandson (2nd to 4th memoir) and provides insight into the politically charged royal court. What stands out is the fact that her husband, Crown Prince Sado, was a mentally unstable man who was eventually ordered into a rice chest and left there to die by his own father, the King. His madness and instability led to violent outbursts and obsessions, among other things, thus deeming him a threat to the future of the kingdom. Lady Hyegyong also writes of the implications for her family - the execution of her brothers, the turmoil amongst the royal in-laws, and her own despair at having to live through all this.
The first memoir is lighter in tone as it details her entrance into the court: the selection process for a crown princess and the many protocols and filial duties demanded of her. It is addressed to her nephew, the heir of that family, thus also provides insight into her father and brother's lives and their relationship and role within the royal court. I'm currently going through the 2nd memoir, and it is depressing to read about the politically charged existence her own son and grandson (both heirs to the throne) had to live in.
Despite the heavy tone of this book, I do find it entirely fascinating. I probably will have to read it in small chunks as I can't handle reading about her brother being executed, followed by her having to deal with a higher ranked female (Queen Dowager) trying to manipulate her own grandson into distrusting her and her brother, his grand uncle. Because of her husband's sins and death, her father-in-law, the King, had her son posthumously adopted by Prince Sado's older brother as a means of distancing him from this scandal. This meant she could not become Queen Dowager (a position held by the King's grandmother) and had little power in the royal court. I may be getting the details all wrong, but suffice to say, the politics of today would be no match for that of the Korean monarchy, or any ancient monarchy for that matter.
I picked up a few more books while I was at the library but these aren't any fun: the memoirs of an Irish priest who lived in my hometown (he was my mom's friend and was a really nice priest) and his recollection of the martial law period, injustice, and the plight of the poor; my mom's book on the Mangyans of Mindoro (not depressing but given that it's about the indigenous poor...), and another book by the Irish priest about a group of people wrongly accused of killing a mayor (martial law stories are never good). There's one more that seems to be about the history of the Korean monarchy but I haven't read much and so can't tell if it's depressing or not.
My interest in the Korean monarchy stems from finding out about historical Kdramas and wanting to know the actual facts rather than the embellished ones the scriptwriters try to sell. I'm embarrassed to admit that I know of historical Kdramas (sagueks?).
To balance things out I realized that I needed to pick up a few books related to Philippine history hence the books about my hometown (was surprised to find them at my university library, actually). I also have never read any of my mom's books, and she's written a few about indigenous groups, as well as a few on the history/ethnography of my island.
Side note: my ex read 2 of her books as reference for his graduate studies. Another side note: my mom wrote the book I picked up in 1976-so when she was my age she was already publishing books! My writing is limited to being 3rd or 4th author in journal articles.

